<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Best Illusion of the Year Contest &#187; Blur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://illusionoftheyear.com/tag/blur/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://illusionoftheyear.com</link>
	<description>Best Illusion of the Year Contest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:28:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dramatically Different Percepts between Foveal and Peripheral Vision</title>
		<link>http://illusionoftheyear.com/2008/dramatically-different-percepts-between-foveal-and-peripheral-vision/</link>
		<comments>http://illusionoftheyear.com/2008/dramatically-different-percepts-between-foveal-and-peripheral-vision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 05:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Finalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knight, Emily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lu, Zhong-Lin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shapiro, Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peripheral]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://illusioncontest.neuralcorrelate.com/wp/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emily Knight, Arthur Shapiro &#038; Zhong-Lin Lu Bucknell University and University of Southern California, USA © 2008 Knight, Shapiro &#038; Lu An object viewed directly (foveal vision) appears noticeably different from the same object viewed indirectly (peripheral vision). To investigate this aspect of how we see, our illusions accentuate the differences between foveal and peripheral [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="authors"><a href="http://www.shapirolab.net/">Emily Knight</a>, <a href="http://www.shapirolab.net/">Arthur Shapiro</a> &#038; <a href="#">Zhong-Lin Lu</a></p>
<div class="afil">Bucknell University and University of Southern California, USA</div>
</div>
<div class="illusion">

<object width="640" height="480">
<param name="movie" value="finalists_2008/knight/The peripheral escalator_for NeuralCorrelate.swf"></param>
<param name="quality" value="high"></param>
<param name="wmode" value="window"></param>
<param name="menu" value="false"></param>
<param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff"></param>
<embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="480" src="finalists_2008/knight/The peripheral escalator_for NeuralCorrelate.swf" quality="high" bgcolor="#ffffff" wmode="window" menu="false" ></embed>
</object>
</p>
<div class="copyright">© 2008 Knight, Shapiro &#038; Lu</div>
</div>
<p>An object viewed directly (foveal vision) appears noticeably different from the same object viewed indirectly (peripheral vision).  To investigate this aspect of how we see, our illusions accentuate the differences between foveal and peripheral perception.  In one of these illusions, the &#8220;peripheral escalator,&#8221; zebra-like columns swing back and forth across the screen.  Viewed foveally, the columns appear to move along a horizontal path; viewed peripherally (focus your gaze several inches above the screen), the columns appear to shift back and forth along a diagonal path.  The results illustrate that peripheral vision is not just a blurry version of foveal vision.</p>
<p><a href="finalists_2008/knight/KnightShapiroLu_Dramatically different percepts between foveal and peripheral visionF.pdf">Read more about the illusion and possible explanations</a> </p>
<iframe id="basic_facebook_social_plugins_likebutton" src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fillusionoftheyear.com%2F2008%2Fdramatically-different-percepts-between-foveal-and-peripheral-vision%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=&amp;action=like&amp;font=arial&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:px; height:25px"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://illusionoftheyear.com/2008/dramatically-different-percepts-between-foveal-and-peripheral-vision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Has All the Motion Gone?</title>
		<link>http://illusionoftheyear.com/2007/where-has-all-the-motion-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://illusionoftheyear.com/2007/where-has-all-the-motion-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 05:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2007 Finalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knight, Emily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shapiro, Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3rd prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://illusioncontest.neuralcorrelate.com/wp/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2007 Third prize Arthur Shapiro &#038; Emily Knight Bucknell University, USA (© 2007 Arthur Shapiro and Emily Knight) Click on the big button to toggle between a blurred version of the display and an unblurred version. When the display is blurred, the motion is dramatic; when the display is not blurred, there is only minimal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="prize">2007 Third prize</div>
<div class="authors"><a href="http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/shapiro/">Arthur Shapiro</a> &#038; Emily Knight</p>
<div class="afil">Bucknell University, USA</div>
</div>
<div class="illusion">

<object width="600" height="400">
<param name="movie" value="finalists_2007/Illusion_29_Shapiro/Gauge_fl8_blur_main1.swf"></param>
<param name="quality" value="high"></param>
<param name="wmode" value="window"></param>
<param name="menu" value="false"></param>
<param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff"></param>
<param name="flashvars" value=" bgcolor=#eeeeee"></param>
<embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="600" height="400" src="finalists_2007/Illusion_29_Shapiro/Gauge_fl8_blur_main1.swf" quality="high" bgcolor="#ffffff" wmode="window" menu="false" flashvars=" bgcolor=#eeeeee" ></embed>
</object>
</p>
<div class="copyright">(© 2007 Arthur Shapiro and Emily Knight)</div>
</div>
<p>Click on the big button to toggle between a blurred version of the display and an unblurred version.  When the display is blurred, the motion is dramatic; when the display is not blurred, there is only minimal motion.  The effect can also be seen with a defocused lens. Blur eliminates high-spatial frequencies. It does not add information to the image.  Why, therefore, does the removal of high-spatial frequencies add motion to the display? The buttons and levers allow control over the many of the parameters in the display.</p>
<p><a href="http://illusioncontest.neuralcorrelate.com/ShapiroKnight_Where has all the motion gone.swf">View more demos</a></p>
<p><a href="finalists_2007/Illusion_29_Shapiro/ShapiroKnight_Where has all the motion gone.pdf">Read more about the illusion and possible explanations</a> </p>
<iframe id="basic_facebook_social_plugins_likebutton" src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fillusionoftheyear.com%2F2007%2Fwhere-has-all-the-motion-gone%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=&amp;action=like&amp;font=arial&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:px; height:25px"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://illusionoftheyear.com/2007/where-has-all-the-motion-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

